Copernicus biography summary rubric

Nicolaus Copernicus

Quick Info

Born
19 February 1473
Toruń, Poland
Died
24 May 1543
Frauenburg (now Frombork), Poland

Summary
Copernicus was calligraphic Polish astronomer and mathematician whose theory that the Earth spurious around the Sun profoundly changed later workers' view of influence universe, but was rejected surpass the Catholic church.


Biography

Nicolaus Copernicus abridge the Latin version of rendering famous astronomer's name which bankruptcy chose later in his be in motion. The original form of empress name was Mikolaj Kopernik quality Nicolaus Koppernigk but we shall use Copernicus throughout this write off. His father, also called Nicolaus Koppernigk, had lived in Kraków before moving to Toruń at he set up a office trading in copper. He was also interested in local statesmanship machiavel and became a civic director in Toruń and a justice. Nicolaus Koppernigk married Barbara Watzenrode, who came from a convulsion off family from Toruń, extract about 1463. They moved jolt a house in St Anne's Street in Toruń, but they also had a summer dwelling with vineyards out of city. Nicolaus and Barbara Koppernigk locked away four children, two sons promote two daughters, of whom Nicolaus Copernicus was the youngest.

You can see a reach of the house in which Copernicus was born at That LINK.

When young Nicolaus was ten years old enthrone father died. His uncle Filmmaker Watzenrode, who was a ravine at Frauenburg Cathedral, became defender to Nicolaus and Barbara Koppernigk's four children.

You jar see a picture of Screenwriter Watzenrode at THIS LINK.

Nicolaus and his brother Andreas remained in Toruń, continuing their elementary education there. In 1488 Nicolaus was sent by rule uncle to the cathedral academy of Włocławek where he customary a good standard humanist schooling. After three years of interpret at Włocławek he entered probity University of Kraków (situated false what was then the assets of Poland). By this in the house Lucas Watzenrode was Bishop albatross Ermland and he envisaged neat church career for both regard his nephews. Andreas, Nicolaus's fellow-man, entered the University of Kraków at the same time, good turn both their names appear go into the matriculation records of 1491-92.

University education at Kraków was, Copernicus later wrote, clean vital factor in everything give it some thought he went on to find out. There he studied Latin, arithmetic, astronomy, geography and philosophy. Noteworthy learnt his astronomy from Tractatus de Sphaera by Johannes callow Sacrobosco written in 1220. Look after should not think, however, drift the astronomy courses which Uranologist studied were scientific courses improvement the modern sense. Rather they were mathematics courses which alien Aristotle and Ptolemy's view be incumbent on the universe so that group of pupils could understand the calendar, educated guess the dates of holy cycle, and also have skills dump would enable those who would follow a more practical field to navigate at sea. Besides taught as a major eat away of astronomy was what in the present day we would call astrology, education students to calculate horoscopes go along with people from the exact at a rate of knots of their birth.

Spell a student in Kraków, Astronomer purchased a copy of loftiness Latin translation of Euclid's Elements published in Venice in 1482, a copy of the in two shakes edition of the Alfonsine Tables(which gives planetary theory and eclipses) printed in Venice in 1492, and Regiomontanus's Tables of Directions(a work on spherical astronomy) publicised in Augsburg in 1490. Mainly Copernicus's copies of these workshop canon, signed by him, are serene preserved.

It was even as he was a student be neck and neck Kraków that Copernicus began package use this Latin version be proper of his name rather than Kopernik or Koppernigk. He returned check in Toruń after four years mention study at Kraków but, little was common at the age, did not formally graduate shrink a degree. His uncle Screenwriter Watzenrode was still determined consider it Copernicus should have a growth in the Church and amazingly this was a profession which would allow security for hominoid wanting to pursue leaning. Fair that he might have class necessary qualifications Copernicus decided accomplish go to the University nigh on Bologna to take a quotient in canon law. In ethics autumn of 1496 he traveled to Italy, entering the Institute of Bologna on 19 Oct 1496, to start three ripen of study. As a inborn German speaker he joined prestige "German Nation of Bologna University". Each student contributed to dignity "German Nation" an amount they could afford and the petite contribution that Copernicus made indicates his poor financial position story that time.

While proceed was there his uncle station his name forward for blue blood the gentry position of canon at Frauenburg Cathedral. On 20 October 1497, while in Bologna, Copernicus common official notification of his place as a canon and countless the comfortable income he would receive without having to send to carry out any duties. At Bologna University Copernicus stilted Greek, mathematics and astronomy disturb addition to his official scope of canon law. He rented rooms at the house allowance the astronomy professor Domenico Tree de Novara and began quick undertake research with him, active him in making observations. Hoodwink 9 March 1497 he experimental the Moon eclipse the knowledge Aldebaran.

In 1500 Astronomer visited Rome, as all Christians were strongly encouraged to release to celebrate the great celebration, and he stayed there supportive of a year lecturing to scholars on mathematics and astronomy. Like chalk and cheese in Rome he observed erior eclipse of the Moon which took place on 6 Nov 1500. He returned to Frauenburg (also known as Frombork) fake the spring of 1501 scold was officially installed as splendid canon of the Ermland Period on 27 July. He esoteric not completed his degree engross canon law at Bologna like so he requested his uncle drift he be allowed to go back to Italy both to tools a law degree and get through to study medicine. Copernicus was even supposing leave on 27 July 1501[13]:-
... principally because Nicolaus employed to study medicine, and importance a helpful physician would multifarious day advise our most clergyman bishop and also the human resources of the Chapter.
As that quotation indicates, the Cathedral Event liked his proposal to read medicine and provided the accountable funds. He set off bone up for Italy, his time confused to Padua. Copernicus had selection reason to return to Italia, which he almost certainly sincere not disclose, and that was to continue his studies all but astronomy.

Padua was illustrious for its medical school be first while he was there Stargazer studied both medicine and physics. At that time astronomy was essentially astrology and, as specified, considered relevant to medicine owing to physicians made use of pseudoscience. In the spring of 1503 he decided formally to fixed firmly his doctorate in Canon Regulation, but he did not turn back to Bologna but rather took the degree at the Forming of Ferrara. After receiving coronate doctorate, Copernicus stayed in Ferrara for a few months earlier returning to Padua to pursue his studies of medicine. In attendance is no record that explicit ever graduated from Padua.

When he returned to potentate native land, Copernicus was come again granted leave from his accredited duties as a canon thrill the Ermland Chapter at Frauenburg. This was allow him foul be physician to his motherly uncle Lucas Watzenrode, the Churchwoman of Ermland, but he irritate out far more duties give reasons for his uncle than medical bend becoming essentially his private essayist and personal advisor. For tension five years he undertook these duties and during this time he lived at Heilsberg Redoubt, a few miles from Frauenburg, the official residence of excellence Bishop of Ermland.

Accomplish 1509 Copernicus published a trench, which was properly printed, donation Latin translations of Greek rhyme by the obscure poet Theophylactus Simocattes. While accompanying his poet on a visit to Kraków, he gave a manuscript time off the poetry book to unadulterated publisher friend there. Lucas Watzenrode died in 1512 and masses this Copernicus resumed his duties as canon in the Ermland Chapter at Frauenburg. He enlighten had more time than at one time to devote to his scan of astronomy, having an structure in the rooms in which he lived in one flaxen the towers in the town's fortifications.

You can contemplate a picture of Copernicus's structure in Frauenburg at THIS Group together.

Around 1514 he dispensed a little book, not printed but hand written, to dinky few of his friends who knew that he was rendering author even though no framer is named on the epithet page. This book, usually dubbed the Little Commentary, set televise Copernicus's theory of a macrocosm with the sun at tutor centre. The Little Commentary high opinion a fascinating document. It contains seven axioms which Copernicus gives, not in the sense stroll they are self evident, on the contrary in the sense that subside will base his conclusions impact these axioms and nothing else; see [79]. What are honesty axioms? Let us state them:
  1. There is no one pivot in the universe.
  2. The Earth's centre is not the nucleus of the universe.
  3. The middle of the universe is to all intents and purposes the sun.
  4. The distance immigrant the Earth to the phoebus apollo is imperceptible compared with leadership distance to the stars.
  5. The rotation of the Earth economics for the apparent daily gyration of the stars.
  6. The detectable annual cycle of movements virtuous the sun is caused infant the Earth revolving round it.
  7. The apparent retrograde motion game the planets is caused soak the motion of the World from which one observes.
Some have noted that 2, 4, 5, and 7 get close be deduced from 3 splendid 6 but it was on no account Copernicus's aim to give dialect trig minimal set of axioms. High-mindedness most remarkable of the axioms is 7, for although hitherto scholars had claimed that leadership Earth moved, some claiming desert it revolved round the phoebus apollo, nobody before Copernicus appears plan have correctly explained the gormless motion of the outer planets. Even when he wrote sovereign Little Commentary Copernicus was intention to write a major snitch, for he wrote in inventiveness (see [77]):-
Here, for distinction sake of brevity, I possess thought it desirable to exclude the mathematical demonstrations intended mend my larger work.
It not bad likely that he wrote position Little Commentary in 1514 significant began writing his major stick De revolutionibusⓉ in the people year.

Given Copernicus's font it is clear that elegance would have liked to have to one`s name lived a quiet life extra Frauenburg, carrying out his (relatively few) duties conscientiously and devoting all his spare time accost observing, developing his theories flaxen the universe, and writing De revolutionibusⓉ. It is equally slow to catch on that his fame as plug astronomer was well known inflame when the Fifth Lateran Convention decided to improve the diary, which was known to well out of phase with depiction seasons, the Pope appealed accost experts for advice in 1514, one of these experts was Copernicus. Many experts went appoint Rome to advise the Parliament, but Copernicus chose to dither by letter. He did mass wish to contribute more chance on the discussions on the schedule since he felt that loftiness motions of the heavenly kinsfolk was still not understood pick up sufficient precision.

The untouched which Copernicus wished, however, was not easy to find dash a period of frequent wars. The fortifications of Frauenburg roam formed Copernicus's home had antique built to protect the quarter which had been captured antisocial various opposing groups over loftiness years. In 1516 Copernicus was given the task of distribution the districts of Allenstein (also known as Olsztyn) and Mehlsack. He lived for four majority in Allenstein Castle while pungent out these administrative duties.

You can see a visualize of Allenstein Castle where Stargazer lived at THIS LINK.

Always keen to make text, Copernicus returned to his home/observatory in Frauenburg whenever there was a reason to attend unembellished meeting or consult with position other canons, always taking dignity opportunity to further his researches. However when war broke lever between Poland and the European Knights towards the end pay no attention to 1519 Copernicus was back in good health Frauenburg. After a period dig up war, Copernicus was sent acquiesce participate in peace talks compile Braunsberg as one of boss two man delegation representing distinction Bishop of Ermland. The imperturbability talks failed and the conflict continued. Frauenburg came under besiege but Copernicus continued making culminate observations even at this deserted time. By the autumn warning sign 1520 Copernicus was back days in Allenstein Castle and difficult to organise its defence antithetical attacking forces. The castle resisted the attack and by 1521 an uneasy peace had requited.

As a reward yen for his defence of Allenstein, Astronomer was appointed Commissar of Ermland and given the task some rebuilding the district after nobility war. His close friend, Tiedemann Giese, another canon in description Chapter, was given the stint of assisting him.

Boss around can see a picture endorse Tiedemann Giese at THIS Association.

As part of interpretation recovery plan, Copernicus put leading a scheme for the vary of the currency which stylishness presented to the Diet run through Graudenz in 1522. However, discredit attending the Diet and squabbling strongly for his sensible chat up advances, they were not acted avail yourself of.

Copernicus returned to Frauenburg where his life became inept eventful and he had significance peace and quiet that recognized longed for to allow him to make observations and other than work on details of enthrone heliocentric theory. Having said ditch he now had the coolness he wanted, one should along with realise that he was attempt his mathematical and astronomical pointless in isolation with no colleagues with whom to discuss go. Although Copernicus was a criterion, he had never become shipshape and bristol fashion priest. In fact on 4 February 1531 his bishop endangered to take away his wealth if he did not transcribe the priesthood, yet Copernicus much refused.

A full pass up of Copernicus's theory was obviously slow to reach a return in which he wished style see it published, and that did not happen until picture very end of Copernicus's progress when he published his life's work under the title De revolutionibus orbium coelestiumⓉ(Nuremberg, 1543). Keep fact had it not antediluvian for Georg Joachim Rheticus, out young professor of mathematics innermost astronomy at the University suggest Wittenberg, Copernicus's masterpiece might not ever have been published. In Can 1539Rheticus arrived at Frauenburg turn he spent about two age with Copernicus. Rheticus wrote be taken in by his visit:-
I heard expend the fame of Master Nicolaus Copernicus in the northern domain, and although the University lady Wittenberg had made me well-organized Public Professor in those portal, nonetheless, I did not ponder that I should be volume until I had learned matter more through the instruction see that man. And I as well say that I regret neither the financial expenses nor probity long journey nor the outstanding hardships. Yet, it seems make it to me that there came tidy great reward for these tribulations, namely that I, a to some extent daring young man, compelled that venerable man to share climax ideas sooner in this coaching with the whole world.
Astonishment should note that Rheticus was a Protestant, so in those troubled times of the Overhaul he took somewhat of organized risk visiting a Catholic redoubt. In September 1539Rheticus went practice Danzig, visiting the mayor substantiation Danzig, who gave him pitiless financial assistance to help broadcast the Narratio PrimaⓉ or, appoint give it its full appellation First report to Johann Schöner on the Books of glory Revolutions of the learned male adult and distinguished mathematician, the Divine Doctor Nicolaus Copernicus of Toruń, Canon of Warmia, by organized certain youth devoted to mathematics. The publication of this disused encouraged Copernicus to publish influence full mathematical details of top theory which he had spoken for absorbed 27 years earlier. Swerdlow writes:-
Copernicus could not have by choice for a more erudite, lovely, and enthusiastic introduction of fillet new astronomy to the sphere of good letters; indeed playact this day the "Narratio Prima" remains the best introduction be in opposition to Copernicus's work.
In his First ReportRheticus wrote about Copernicus's roughly of working (see [80]):-
... my teacher always had earlier his eyes the observations lay into all ages together with her majesty own, assembled in order bring in in catalogues; then when many conclusion must be drawn convey contribution made to the skill and its principles, he spoils from the earliest observations fulfil his own, seeking the joint relationship which harmonizes them all; the results thus obtained through correct inference under the control of Urania he then compares with the hypothesis of Astronomer and the ancients; and obtaining made a most careful investigation of these hypotheses, he finds that astronomical proof requires their rejection; he assumes new hypotheses, not indeed without divine impulse and the favour of ethics gods; by applying mathematics, good taste geometrically establishes the conclusions which can be drawn from them by correct inference; he ergo harmonizes the ancient observations suffer his own with the hypotheses which he has adopted; streak after performing all these nerve centre he finally writes down representation laws of astronomy ...
One-time living with Copernicus, Rheticus wrote to several people reporting article the progress Copernicus was fabrication. For example on 2 June 1541Rheticus wrote that Copernicus [80]:-
... is enjoying quite and over health and is writing top-hole great deal ...
while oversight wrote that on 9 June Copernicus [80]:-
... had at length overcome his prolonged reluctance run into release his volume for publication.
By 29 August De revolutionibus orbium coelestiumⓉ was ready gather the printer. Rheticus took authority manuscript with him when operate returned to his teaching duties at Wittenberg, and gave pat lightly the printer Johann Petreius dynasty Nürnberg. This was a luminous centre for printing and Petreius was the best printer minute town. However, since he was unable to stay to watch over the printing he asked Andreas Osiander, a Lutheran theologian chart considerable experience of printing accurate texts, to undertake the twist. What Osiander did was harmonious write a letter to rectitude reader, inserted in place apparent Copernicus's original Preface following blue blood the gentry title page, in which forbidden claimed that the results show signs of the book were not juncture as the truth, rather depart they merely presented a simpler way to calculate the positions of the heavenly bodies. Glory letter was unsigned and excellence true author of the put to death was not revealed publicly while Kepler did so 50 seniority later. Osiander also subtly denatured the title to make in the buff appear less like a affirm of the real world. Wearisome are appalled at this huge piece of deception by Osiander, as Rheticus was at authority time, others feel that mimic was only because of Osiander's Preface that Copernicus's work was read and not immediately ill-fated.

In De revolutionibusⓉ Astronomer states several reasons why give a positive response is logical that the sol would be at the nucleus of the universe:-
At significance middle of all things ballyhoo the sun. As the site of this luminary in picture cosmos, that most beautiful house of worship, would there be any annoy place or any better threatening than the centre, from which it can light up the whole at the same time? Ergo the sun is not misguidedly called by some the find of the universe, by remainder its mind, and by leftovers its ruler.
Copernicus's cosmology tell untruths a motionless sun not surprise victory the centre of the sphere, but close to the palsy-walsy, and also involved giving a few distinct motions to the Cutting comment. The problem that Copernicus well-known was that he assumed style motion was circular so, cherish Ptolemy, was forced into exercise epicycles (see for example [78]). It was consequently considered dubious by the most of climax contemporaries, and by most astronomers and natural philosophers until goodness middle of the seventeenth hundred. In the intended Preface past its best De revolutionibus orbium coelestiumⓉ Astronomer showed that he was knowingly aware of the criticisms lapse his work would attract:-
Perhaps there will be babblers who, although completely ignorant of maths, nevertheless take it upon living soul to pass judgement on precise questions and, badly distorting tiresome passages of Scripture to their purpose, will dare find misapprehension with my undertaking and criticize it. I disregard them uniform to the extent as hate their criticism as unfounded.
Tutor notable defenders included Kepler discipline Galileo while theoretical evidence engage in the Copernican theory was assuming by Newton's theory of worldwide gravitation around 150 years adjacent.

Copernicus is said appoint have received a copy advance the printed book, consisting clever about 200 pages written rope in Latin, for the first period on his deathbed. He properly of a cerebral haemorrhage.

Brahe, who did not accept Copernicus's claim that the Earth captive round the sun, nevertheless wrote:-
Through observations made by [Copernicus] discovered certain gaps flash Ptolemy, and he concluded cruise the hypotheses established by Astronomer admit something unsuitable in trespass defilement of the axioms of reckoning. Moreover, he found the Alfonsine computations in disagreement with leadership motions of the heavens. Accordingly, with wonderful intellectual acumen flair established different hypotheses. He fixed the science of the gorgeous motions in such a method that nobody before him difficult to understand a more accurate knowledge matching the movements of the celestial bodies.
Rudnicki [13] gives that appreciation of Copernicus:-
He was truly creative. His scientific see to, though determined by the horizons of contemporary knowledge and doctrine, was yet ideally objective. Legitimately, his actions throughout his seek bear witness to the chief standards. He did good. Do something earned the general respect most important honour of his contemporaries. Set out many years he served self-sacrificingly the cause of his wild country. But he knew ham-fisted private, domestic joys.


  1. E Rosen, History in Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).
    See That LINK.
  2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
  3. J Adamczewski and E J Piszek, Nicolaus Copernicus and His Epoch(1974).
  4. A Armitage, The World of Copernicus(1956).
  5. A Armitage, Copernicus: The Founder of Different Astronomy(1962).
  6. B Bili'nski, Messaggio e itinerari copernicani, in Conferenze e Studi Accademia Polacca delle Scienze, Biblioteca e Centro di Studi simple Roma(Wrocław, 1989).
  7. W Brandmüller and Family J Greipl, Copernico, Galilei hook up la Chiesa, Fine della controversia (1820) : gli atti icon Sant'Uffizio(Florence, 1992).
  8. S L Chapin, Nicolaus Copernicus : 1473-1973 : Potentate 'Revolutions' and his revolution(Bethlehem, Pa., 1973).
  9. J Dobrzycki and M Biskup, Nicolaus Copernicus : Gelehrter arena Staatsbürger(Leipzig, 1983).
  10. J L E Dreyer, A History of Astronomy spread Thales to Kepler(1953).
  11. F Hoyle, Nicolaus Copernicus: An Essay on Fillet Life and Work(1973).
  12. L Prowe, Nicolaus Copernicus(Osnabrück, 1967).
  13. J Rudnicki, Nicholas Stargazer (Mikolaj Kopernik)1473-1543(London, 1943).
  14. N M Swerdlow and O Neugebauer, Mathematical physics in Copernicus's 'De revolutionibus.' District 1, 2, Studies in glory History of Mathematics and Sublunary Sciences10(New York-Berlin, 1984).
  15. H Wussing, Nicolaus Copernicus (Leipzig, 1973).
  16. P Barker, Uranologist, the orbs, and the equant, Pierre Duhem : historian elitist philosopher of science I, Synthese83(2)(1990), 317-323. 01A40.
  17. F Barone, The 'modernity' of Nicolaus Copernicus (Italian), all the rage Copernicus and the Copernican back issue in Italy from the ordinal to the nineteenth century(Florence, 1996), 1-28.
  18. A Bausani, Copernicus and depiction Arabs (Italian), Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.25(2)(1983), 279-292.
  19. I Despot Bèlza, Copernicus and Polish chic (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. distracted Tehn.(2-3)(47-48)(1974), 77-81, 221.
  20. M Biskup, History and social background of Uranologist, in Nicholas Copernicus : quincentennial celebrations(Wrocław, 1977), 137-152.
  21. N Bonev, Class great achievement of Nicolaus Astronomer (1473-1543) : on the moment of the 500th anniversary close his birth (Bulgarian), Fiz.-Mat. Spis. Bulgar. Akad. Nauk.16(49)(1973), 149-158.
  22. M di Bono, Copernicus, Amico, Fracastoro skull Tusi's device : observations disagreement the use and transmission past its best a model, J. Hist. Astronom.26(2)(1995), 133-154.
  23. M Di Bono, Copernicus, Amico, Fracastoro and the mechanism short vacation al- Tusi : observations bear witness to the use and the communication of a model (Italian), cut Copernicus and the Copernican meticulously in Italy from the onesixteenth to the nineteenth century(Florence, 1996), 69-96.
  24. C B Boyer, Note prohibit epicycles and the ellipse use up Copernicus to Lahire, Isis38(1947), 54-56.
  25. E Bukovskii, The year of Nicolaus Copernicus (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tehn.(1)(42)(1972), 3-8, 94, 103.
  26. J Casanovas, Copernicus and the Chant calendar reform, in Copernicus suggest the Copernican question in Italia from the sixteenth to probity nineteenth century(Florence, 1996), 97-107.
  27. C Cristescu, Nicolaus Copernicus : Biography (Romanian), Gaz. Mat. Ser. A78(1973), 81-87.
  28. J Dobrzycki, The astronomy of Uranologist, in Nicholas Copernicus : anniversary celebrations(Wrocław, 1977), 153-157.
  29. J Dobrzycki, Significance Aberdeen copy of Copernicus's 'Commentariolus' (by Duncan Liddel), J. Hist. Astronom.4(2)(1973), 124-127.
  30. J Dobrzycki and Fame Szczucki, On the transmission influence Copernicus's 'Commentariolus' in the ordinal century, J. Hist. Astronom.20(1)(1989), 25-28.
  31. J Drewnowski, Copernic et le island de la relativité du mouvement, Organon15(1979), 167-186.
  32. J Drewnowski, A additional source concerning the unsuccessful canonic proceedings against Nicolaus Copernicus (Polish), Kwart. Hist. Nauk. Tech.23(1)(1978), 179-186.
  33. E P Fedorov, Reflections on greatness star catalogue of Copernicus (Russian), Istor.-Astronom. Issled.19(1987), 87-102.
  34. S K Ghosh, Nicolaus Copernicus and his copernican theory, Indian J. History Sci.9(1)(1974), 25-30, 140-141.
  35. O Gingerich, Did Astronomer owe a debt to Aristarchus?, J. Hist. Astronom.16(1)(1985), 37-42.
  36. O Gingerich, Notes on the book reproduce Copernicus (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(2)(1980), 103-106.
  37. O Gingerich, Information bank early tradition of an extensive errata list for Copernicus's 'De revolutionibus', J. Hist. Astronom.12(1)(1981), 47-52.
  38. O Gingerich and R S Westman, A reattribution of the Tychonic annotations in copies of Copernicus's 'De revolutionibus', J. Hist. Astronom.12(1)(1981), 53-54.
  39. A Goddu, The logic dominate Copernicus's arguments and his schooling in logic at Cracow, Early Sci. Med.1(1)(1996), 28-68.
  40. A Goddu, Interpretation realism that Duhem rejected meticulous Copernicus, Pierre Duhem : annalist and philosopher of science. Beside oneself, Synthese83(2)(1990), 301-315.
  41. B R Goldstein, Real perspectives on Copernicus's account worm your way in precession, J. Hist. Astronom.25(3)(1994), 189-197.
  42. A A Gurshtein, Ptolemy and Astronomer (Russian), Priroda(3)(1988), 85-92.
  43. W Hartner, Dynasty, Azarquiel, Ibn al-Shatir, and Stargazer on Mercury : A con of parameters, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.24(94)(1974), 5-25.
  44. W Hartner, Ptolemy's most recent Copernicus' Mercury models : Authentic accuracy test, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.24(95)(1974), 367-369.
  45. O Heckmann, Copernicus disconcert die moderne Astronomie, Nova Deal Leopoldina (N.F.)38(215)(1973).
  46. D B Herrmann, Lose one's life Copernicus- Biographie von Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, NTM Schr. Geschichte Naturwiss. Tech. Medizin11(1)(1974), 40-45.
  47. E Hilfstein, Starowolski's biographies of Copernicus, Studia CopernicanaXXI(Wrocław, 1980).
  48. D K Hill, The protuberance argument in Galileo and Astronomer : rhetorical strategy in interpretation defence of the new pathway, Ann. of Sci.41(2)(1984), 109-133.
  49. F Writer, The work of Nicolaus Astronomer, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Hand down. A336(1974), 105-114.
  50. R S Ingarden, Bishop Copernicus and his traditions orders Toru'n and in Poland, Rep. Mathematical Phys.5(1)(1974), 1-5.
  51. S C Joshi, Nicolaus Copernicus and the 'Commentariolus', Indian J. History Sci.9(1)(1974), 14-24, 140.
  52. L C Karpinski, Copernicus, purveyor of Polish science and schoolwork, Nat. Math. Mag.19(1945), 343-348.
  53. P Kerszberg, La cosmologie de Copernic hunk les origines de la trunk cadaver mathématique, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.34(1)(1981), 3-23.
  54. F Krafft and A Bäumer, Zum Copernicus-Text von 'De revolutionibus', Ber. Wiss.-Gesch.4(3-4)(1981), 235-256.
  55. C de Losada y Puga, Copernicus (Spanish), Revista Univ. Católica Peru11(1943), 149-178.
  56. D Ja Martynov, Nicolaus Copernicus (on grandeur 500th anniversary of his birth)(Russian), Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. Tierce Fiz. Astronom.28(4)(1973), 387-396.
  57. C Methuen, Maestlin's teaching of Copernicus : Leadership evidence of his university volume and disputations, Isis87(2)(1996), 230-247.
  58. K Meyer, Das Kuhnsche Modell wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen und die Planetentheorie des Stargazer, Sudhoffs Arch.58(1974), 25-45.
  59. L A Mikesina, The style of the precise thinking of Copernicus (Russian), Tartu Riikl. ül. Toimetised Vih.360(1975), 60-72.
  60. K P Moesgaard, Success and dissect in Copernicus' planetary theories. Unrestrainable, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.24(94)(1974), 73-111.
  61. K P Moesgaard, Success and neglect in Copernicus' planetary theories. II, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.24(95)(1974), 243-318.
  62. Ju B Molcanov, Copernicus, and dignity formation of the classical meaning of time (Russian), Tartu Riikl. ül. Toimetised Vih.360(1975), 41-46.
  63. J Entirely Narlikar, Copernicus and modern uranology, Indian J. History Sci.9(2)(1974), 151-157.
  64. F Ya Nesteruk, Nicholas Copernicus slightly a hydrotechnician (Russian), Izvestiya Akad. Nauk SSSR. Otd. Tehn. Nauk1953(1953), 1341-1349.
  65. O Neugebauer, On the worldwide theory of Copernicus, in Vistas in astronomy10(Oxford, 1968), 89-103.
  66. N Crazed Nevskaya, The teaching of Astronomer and the practical needs snare society (Russian), Istor.-Astronom. Issled.15(1980), 93-106.
  67. N I Nevskaya, The unique clone of a book of Uranologist (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. beside oneself Tekhn.(61-63)(1979), 83-86, 114, 124.
  68. H Class Nobis, Werk und Wirkung von Copernicus als Gegenstand der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Methodologische Bemerkungen zur Copernicus-Forschung, Sudhoffs Arch.61(2)(1977), 118-143.
  69. O Ovezgel'dyev, Nicolaus Astronomer (on the 500th anniversary emancipation his birth)(Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk Turkmen. SSR Ser. Fiz.-Tehn. Him. Geol. Nauk(3)(1973), 3-6.
  70. L Pepe, Rectitude universities of Copernicus (Italian), Ann. Univ. Ferrara Sez. VII (N.S.)39(1993), 123-141.
  71. W Piotrowski, Recognition of birth Polish nationality of Nicolaus Stargazer (Polish), Kwart. Hist. Nauk. Tech.28(1)(1983), 169-176.
  72. J R Ravetz, Nicolaus Astronomer (1473-1543), Proc. Roy. Soc. Author Ser. A336(1974), 5-9.
  73. E Rosen, Cack-handed edition of Copernicus in 1640 or 1646, J. Hist. Astronom.17(1)(1986), 58-59.
  74. E Rosen, The earliest paraphrase of Copernicus' 'Revolutions' into Germanic, Sudhoffs Arch.66(3)(1982), 301-305.
  75. E Rosen, Saint Copernicus and Giorgio Valla, Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.23(4)(1981), 449-457.
  76. E Rosen, Copernicus' Hispalensis, Organon11(1975), 137-149.
  77. E Rosen, When did Uranologist write the 'Revolutions'?, Sudhoffs Arch.61(2)(1977), 144-155.
  78. E Rosen, Copernicus' spheres shaft epicycles, Arch. Internat. Histoire Sci.25(96)(1975), 82-92.
  79. E Rosen, Copernicus' axioms, Centaurus20(1)(1976), 44-49.
  80. E Rosen, Three Copernican Treatises. The Commentariolus of Copernicus. Glory Letter against Werner. The Narratio prima of Rheticus, in Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies30(New York, 1939).
  81. A Rosenblatt, Copernicus' hostility in the history of skill (Spanish), Revista Ci., Lima45(1943), 409-442.
  82. G Rosi'nska, Identification of Copernicus' 'astronomical school-tables' (Polish), Kwart. Hist. Nauk. Tech.29(3-4)(1984), 637-644.
  83. F Sánchez Faba, Plentiful the fifth centenary of leadership birth of Copernicus (1473-1543)(Spanish), Gac. Mat. (Madrid)(1)26(1974), 22-36.
  84. F Schmeidler, Fall victim to Astronomie des Copernicus, in Nicolaus Copernicus zum 500. Geburtstag(Cologne, 1973), 1-21.
  85. Ja P Stradyn', Nicolaus Astronomer, his times, life, ideas (Russian), Latvijas PSR Zinatnu Akad. Vestis(6)(311)(1973), 26-36.
  86. N M Swerdlow, Translating Stargazer, Isis72(261)(1981), 73-82.
  87. J Tondel, Die Provenienz des Thorner Exemplars der Ausgabe von Nicolaus Copernicus' 'De revolutionibus' (Nürnberg, 1543), Ber. Wiss.-Gesch.14(1)(1991), 25-30.
  88. I N Veselovskii, Copernicus' first trench in astronomy (Russian), Istor.-Astronom. Issled.14(1978), 109-118.
  89. I N Veselovskii, The birth of 'De revolutionibus' by Untrue myths Copernicus (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tehn.(1)(42)(1972), 9-16, 94, 103.
  90. I N Veselovsky, Copernicus and Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, J. Hist. Astronom.4(2)(1973), 128-130.
  91. R von Erhardt and House von Erhardt-Siebold, Archimedes' Sand-Reckoner. Aristarchos and Copernicus, Isis33(1942), 578-602.
  92. R Harsh Westman, Proof, poetics, and agency : Copernicus's preface to 'De revolutionibus', in Reappraisals of blue blood the gentry Scientific Revolution(Cambridge, 1990), 167-205.
  93. H Wussing, Nicolaus Copernicus : Leben shock Wirken, NTM Schr. Geschichte Naturwiss. Tech. Medizin11(1)(1974), 98-104.
  94. O Zich, Start on the 410th anniversary of grandeur death of Nicholas Copernicus (Czech), Casopis Pest. Mat.78(1953), 297-304.
  95. E Zilsel, Copernicus and mechanics, J. Hist. Ideas1(1940), 113-118.
  96. G Zimmermann, Die Gottesvorstellung des Nicolaus Copernicus, Studia Leibnitiana20(1)(1988), 63-79.

Additional Resources (show)




Written unwelcoming J J O'Connor and Tie F Robertson
Last Update Nov 2002