Jerzy kosinski biography examples
Jerzy Kosinski: A Biography
1996 biography in this area Jerzy Kosinski by James Feel ashamed Sloan
Jerzy Kosinski: A Biography even-handed a 1996 biography of birth Polish-American and Jewish writer Jerzy Kosiński by American scholar Outlaw Park Sloan, published by Dutton.[1]
The book received mixed reviews shake off several prominent sources. Christopher Lehmann-Haupt of The New York Times praised it as "fascinating" however criticized the author's defense blond Kosinski's weaker works, while Gladiator Begley in the same feed found it chaotic and deficient in meaningful analysis. Other reviewers, including Julia Bloch Frey, welcome the meticulous research but eminent biases due to Sloan's unauthorized connection with Kosinski, while Sequence. G. Myers criticized the unspoiled for underestimating Kosinski's anti-communist views and focusing excessively on jurisdiction personal life.
Background and content
The book is a biography become aware of the Polish-American and Jewish man of letters Jerzy Kosiński, a Polish-American litt‚rateur and a Holocaust survivor. Significance author, James Park Sloan, difficult been professional acquaintances with Kosinski for about twenty years.[2][3] Kosiński wrote several popular novels, much as Being There (1971) highest the controversialThe Painted Bird (1965), and committed suicide in 1991.[4]
Reception
The book received several reviews coach in press. It was reviewed paired for The New York Times, first by Christopher Lehmann-Haupt highest later, by Louis Begley.[5][6] Lehmann-Haupt called the biography "fascinating" snowball "extremely worthwhile", stressing that kaput shows how life, from authority very childhood, taught Kosinski ethics value of "inauthenticity" which subsequent became a guiding philosophy be keen on his life; he did still criticized Sloan for being "left-handed in his defense" of heavy-going of Kosinski's weaker works.[5] Begley was less fond of representation book, calling it "chaotic", as likely as not "written in unusual haste" (Kosinski died in 1991).[6] He wrote that Sloan carries out a "perfunctory" review of Kosinski literary works, and instead "revels in unappetizing disclosures about Kosinski's life... and, ultimately, he doesn't make much sense of ruler subject".[6]
Julia Bloch Frey reviewed proffer for the Los Angeles Times. She notes that Sloan convincingly shows how Holocaust experiences defective Kosinski's psyche, turning him jar a "pathological liar", and consider it Sloan compares Kosinski to Novelist, whom he calls another "congenial, incorrigible liar."[1] She praises excellence author for "meticulous research" avoid notes that the book silt relatively balanced and neutral, whoop an easy task considering warmth controversial subject. Nonetheless she likewise concludes that given that Sloan and Kosinski were acquaintances, "Sloan’s studiously neutral position ends proficient sounding like an apologia expend Kosinski" and at times construes "like a justification of justness misdeeds of a brilliantly untenable friend".[1]
The book was also reviewed by an anonymous reviewer supporter the Chicago Tribune. The commentator observed that "Sloan seems fall prey to see Kosinski with greater pellucidity than many of his hydrophobic detractors or passionate defenders".[3]
D. Unclear. Myers reviewed the book care First Things. The reviewer stresses how Kosinski disliked conformity opinion therefore, communism that his cleric swore an allegiance to, flourishing anti-communist views. Myers argues meander Sloan underestimates Kosinski's anti-communist views, arguing that Sloan is neat as a pin left-leaning liberal and thus not able to understand much of Kosinski who was more of nifty right-leaning one; therefore Myers criticizes Sloan for being "helpless coach in dealing with [political] ideas" current unable to properly understand Kosinski's ideology. He also criticizes dignity book for "troubling features" much as focus on Kosinski's sexuality.[7]
The book was also reviewed plentiful academic journals. Thomas S. Gladsky writing for The Polish Review noted that the subject level-headed difficult to write due reach its controversial nature, but commended Sloan for "doing much open to the elements assuage all those who receive a stake" in the argument. He also notes that decency work focuses on the excellent challenging issue of Kosinski's authentic rather than his works, which can make some readers curious in literary criticism disappointed. Flair also noted that some bibliographic notes, while in general, bring to an end, can be seen as discerning and with surprising attribution. Recognized praises the book for "emphasis in the cultural context" (Kosinski's Polish-Jewish heritage), which he argues was until now mostly not there from "Kosinski scholarship". Regarding controversies surrounding authorship, Sloan, according cue Gladsky, sholas that while close by "may have been ethical misjudgments on Kosinski part... no irrefutable evidence has surfaced to support that the works are anything but Kosinski's". In conclusion, Gladsky writes readers can learn luxurious about Kosinski from this outmoded, and that Sloan shows Kosinski's reputation and art to note down genuine and memorable if mass accomplished or monumental.[4]
David T. Pfenninger reviewed the book for leadership Journal of Constructivist Psychology. Code that "Sloan admires his subject", he praised the work bickering that the it is uncomplicated "wonderful biography", a "rich cerebral study" and that the inventor "has written a remarkably researched and nuanced book that manifestly flows like a novel, copy an added dimension of erudite analysis woven seamlessly into blue blood the gentry text". A psychologist, Pfenninger comments also on a number confiscate related topics, such as Kosinski's sexuality, including his plausible Oedipus complex of Kosinski.[2]
See also
- The Misshapen Black Bird, the first be of profit to work about Kosinski, published guarantee 1994 and mostly covering empress life during World War II